When Security Agreements Mean Torture

| No Comments
Amnesty International is reporting a new security agreement between the USA and Iraq would lead to the torture of over 16,000 detainees:
Thousands of Iraqis detained by US forces are at risk of torture or even execution, following the ratification of a security agreement between the US and Iraqi governments.  Under the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), which will take effect on 31 December, around 16,000 prisoners held by the US will be transferred to Iraqi custody. Those at particular risk include former Ba'ath party officials or those who held posts under Saddam Hussain's government. "The Status of Forces Agreement does not provide any safeguards whatsoever for prisoners transferred to Iraqi custody," said Malcolm Smart, Director of Amnesty International's Middle East and North Africa Programme.

"These prisoners will potentially be moving from the frying pan into the fire. We receive persistent reports of gross human rights violations - including torture - taking place in Iraqi prisons and detention centres. The US must ensure that no one is transferred to Iraq custody if they would face a real risk of torture or other human rights violations."
Is there an uncomfortable disconnect between mind and morality when the liberators become cohorts in torturing those they were liberating?

Related Entries

Leave a comment

BolesBlues.com Logo
UnitedStage.com Logo
Panopticonic.com Logo
CarceralNation.com Logo
Memeingful.com Logo
DramaticMedicine.com Logo
ScientificAesthetic.com Logo
UrbanSemiotic.com Logo
RelationShaping.com Logo
David W. Boles' WordPunk Logo Small
Boles University Logo Small
David W. Boles' Celebrity Semiotic Logo Small
10txt.com Logo
Search BolesBlogs.com Logo
Boles Books Writing and Publishing Logo Small
Hardcore ASL Logo Small
David W. Boles
Script Professor Logo Small